Legalise Freedom

 

Posts Tagged ‘Orwellian’

Exposed: naked body scanner images of film star printed, circulated by airport staff

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

Claims on behalf of authorities that naked body scanner images are immediately destroyed after passengers pass through new x-ray backscatter devices have been proven fraudulent after it was revealed that naked images of Indian film star Shahrukh Khan were printed out and circulated by airport staff at Heathrow in London.

UK Transport Secretary Lord Adonis said last week that the images produced by the scanners were deleted “immediately” and airport staff carrying out the procedure are fully trained and supervised.

“It is very important to stress that the images which are captured by body scanners are immediately deleted after the passenger has gone through the body scanner,” Adonis told the London Evening Standard. (Continues below)

 


Adonis was forced to address privacy concerns following reports that the images produced by the scanners broke child pornography laws in the UK. When the scanners were first introduced, it was also speculated that images of famous people would be ripe for abuse as the pictures produced by the devices make genitals “eerily visible” according to journalists who have investigated trials of the technology.

However, the Transport Secretary’s assurances were demolished after it was revealed on the BBC’s Jonathan Ross show Friday that Indian actor Shahrukh Khan had passed through a body scan and later had the image of his naked body printed out and circulated by Heathrow security staff.

“I was in London recently going through the airport and these new machines have come up, the body scans. You’ve got to see them. It makes you embarrassed – if you’re not well endowed,” said Khan, referring to how the scans produce clear images of a person’s genitals.

Read article: http://www.infowars.com/exposed-naked-body-scanner-images-of-film-star-printed-circulated-by-airport-staff/

Comment on this Article

Airline passengers have ‘no right’ to refuse naked body scanners

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

Airline passengers will have no right to refuse to go through a full-body search scanner when the devices are introduced at Heathrow airport next week, ministers have confirmed.

The option of having a full-body pat-down search instead, offered to passengers at US airports, will not be available despite warnings from the government’s Equality and Human Rights Commission that the scanners, which reveal naked bodies, breach privacy rules under the Human Rights Act.

The transport minister Paul Clark told MPs a random selection of passengers would go through the new scanners at UK airports. The machines’ introduction would be followed later this year by extra “trace” scanners, which can detect liquid explosives. A draft code of practice covering privacy and health issues is being discussed in Whitehall.

Clark dealt with concerns raised by the Commons home affairs select committee about the ability of airports abroad to upgrade their security to similar levels by indicating that extra support and help was under discussion.

Lord West, the counter-terrorism minister, told the MPs the government had firmly ruled out the introduction of “religious or ethnic profiling” into transport security. Instead, he said, airport security staff were being trained in “behavioural profiling”, which meant spotting passengers who had paid cash, were travelling with only a book for luggage on a long-haul flight or were behaving erratically at the airport.

He said the decision to raise the terror threat level to “severe” – meaning an attack was highly likely but not imminent – had been taken by security service officials at the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre last Friday.

The decision, thought to be based on an increase in intelligence traffic on threats from Yemen, was confirmed by the home secretary, Alan Johnson.

West refused to discuss the intelligence behind the decision, saying he was not going to jeopardise “getting the bastards”.

The body scanner trials, which are due to start at Heathrow next week, will involve a machine that has spotted the type of concealed device used in the Detroit airline bombing attempt.

Read article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jan/26/new-body-scanners-heathrow

Comment on this Article

‘Shadow Government’ DVD trailers

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

Comment on this Article

Airport body scanners: a line in the sand?

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

Upon the recent announcement by the British government that full body scanners are to be introduced at UK airports, I find myself facing something of a conundrum. When trials of these scanners recently commenced at selected American airports and their across-the-board introduction was mooted, I was adamant that such humiliation and intrusion into privacy was a bridge too far. I decided that I simply had to draw a line in the sand and refuse to submit any further to the gathering Big Brother state. In the wake of yet another botched, half-baked and highly suspicious ‘terrorist attack’, I’m now facing this day of reckoning sooner than I might have expected.

The question, then, is do I simply go along to get along as I have thus far with each new outrageous intrusion inflicted upon us in the name of fighting the so-called ‘war on terrorism’? After all, I made myself a promise: I will not be marched like a criminal or prisoner through one of those machines. I don’t do much flying these days, but when I do fly, I appreciate the time it saves over alternative methods of travel. However, in an attempt to figure out how I can keep my promise to myself, today I began to revisit some ways of getting around that I used to employ. The train, for example, and cross channel ferries. No one knows what future security measures may be implemented in railway stations and shipping terminals, but for now, they’re being spared the close scrutiny and draconian police state regimes which are rapidly turning catching a plane into one of life’s most unpleasant experiences.

The bigger question, however, is when we are going to stop giving in to all this. What will it take for us, collectively, to say enough is enough? I would imagine that all of you would draw the line at compulsory cavity searches on all flights? You’d like to think so, wouldn’t you? Based on the evidence so far, though, that’s not quite a foregone conclusion. When the next ‘terrorist’ bogeyman sets fire to his genitals or shoes or hat or whatever it may be, will we yet again go along to get along with the ramping up of harassment and humiliation in the name of ‘safety’? (Continues below)

scan

As a cautionary thought, consider how far we’ve already come. For those of you who still see reasonable limits on Big Brother’s control over our lives and on the burgeoning police state, you need only look at history. I grew up in the 1980s, a decade – like all others – which witnessed its fair share of tyranny. And yet if you’d suggested to me back then that we would one day line up like cattle to be searched and questioned, to be ordered around and treated like dirt, to be prevented from carrying even a bottle of water, and all in the name of ‘safety’ and just to catch a bloody airplane? I’d have said ‘No way! People will never, ever go along with that.’ And yet here we are.

Personally, I believe that the ‘threat’ posed by terrorism is relatively remote at best and at worst, often manipulated into being to further an agenda of societal control. But whatever you believe, massive, invasive and dehumanizing ill-treatment of human beings by other human beings has no place in our common future. Whether you believe that Al-Qaeda is entirely as presented to us by the mainstream media or instead a deadly fiction concocted by shadowy secret service groups is in some respects neither here nor there. Unless we address the cause of this disease of violence and cease merely reacting to its symptoms, the path down which we are currently headed will grow much, much darker.

The good news is that we hold incredible power in our own hands if we will only choose to use it. This means saying ‘enough is enough’. It means drawing a line in the sand. It means saying ‘no’. Up to this point, we’ve not been good at doing that. Most of us have said nothing at all. Most of us have gone along to get along. We need to ask ourselves when that’s going to stop.

Comment on this Article

Welcome to Orwell’s World 2010

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

In Nineteen Eighty-Four, George Orwell described a superstate called Oceania, whose language of war inverted lies that “passed into history and became truth. ‘Who controls the past’, ran the Party slogan, ‘controls the future: who controls the present controls the past’.”

Barack Obama is the leader of a contemporary Oceania. In two speeches at the close of the decade, the Nobel Peace Prize winner affirmed that peace was no longer peace, but rather a permanent war that “extends well beyond Afghanistan and Pakistan” to “disorderly regions and diffuse enemies”. He called this “global security” and invited our gratitude. To the people of Afghanistan, which America has invaded and occupied, he said wittily: “We have no interest in occupying your country.” (Continues below)

nsa_1984

In Oceania, truth and lies are indivisible. According to Obama, the American attack on Afghanistan in 2001 was authorised by the United Nations Security Council. There was no UN authority. He said the “the world” supported the invasion in the wake of 9/11 when, in truth, all but three of 37 countries surveyed by Gallup expressed overwhelming opposition. He said that America invaded Afghanistan “only after the Taliban refused to turn over [Osama] bin Laden”. In 2001, the Taliban tried three times to hand over bin Laden for trial, reported Pakistan’s military regime, and were ignored. Even Obama’s mystification of 9/11 as justification for his war is false. More than two months before the Twin Towers were attacked, the Pakistani foreign minister, Niaz Naik, was told by the Bush administration that an American military assault would take place by mid-October. The Taliban regime in Kabul, which the Clinton administration had secretly supported, was no longer regarded as “stable” enough to ensure America’s control over oil and gas pipelines to the Caspian Sea. It had to go.

Obama’s most audacious lie is that Afghanistan today is a “safe haven” for al-Qaeda’s attacks on the West. His own national security adviser, General James Jones, said in October that there were “fewer than 100” al-Qaeda in Afghanistan. According to US intelligence, 90 per cent of the Taliban are hardly Taliban at all, but “a tribal localised insurgency [who] see themselves as opposing the US because it is an occupying power”. The war is a fraud. Only the terminally gormless remain true to the Obama brand of “world peace”.

Read article: http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=16701

Comment on this Article

A blueprint for world government?

Sunday, December 27th, 2009

Whether you’re a regular reader of so-called ‘conspiracy’ material or merely have a passing interest in the dark underbelly of world events, The Club Of Rome is a name with which you will most likely be familiar.

Established in 1968, The Club describes itself as a “non-political organisation founded in concern for the future of humanity.” The various documents and reports The Club has issued over the years are frequently cited in conspiracy writing and investigations into the existence and possible agenda of the New World Order or NWO.

Two of the best-known reports are 1972’s The Limits of Growth and The First Global Revolution, first published in 1991. I purchased a copy of the latter in a small second hand bookstore in 1992, read it, found its language to be fairly wooden and impenetrable and promptly thought no more about it.

In recent years, however, the references I was constantly reading to both documents, but The First Global Revolution in particular, prompted me to dig out my copy and re-read it. The £2.50 price label still attached to it certainly puts its current value of between £40-£90 on Amazon into perspective. Clearly something had changed since 1991 to make this insignificant looking little paperback much sought after. The images of the book shown here are scans of my own copy, the 1992 first UK paperback edition published by Simon & Schuster. (Continues below)

1

In essence, many of the claims made about The First Global Revolution portray it as a blueprint for the NWO: one world government, one world bank, one world army, the end of the sovereign state and – possibly – the end of the sovereign individual. In particular, The First Global Revolution is said to map out a strategy whereby the exaggerated and manipulated threat of man-made global warming will be used to justify the establishment of a New World Order.

While re-reading The First Global Revolution, it became clear that the claims made about its contents vary from outright misrepresentations to completely accurate assessments of the plans it outlines. What follows is a brief trawl through some of the main points backed by direct quotes from the original text. Some of these quotes appear frequently in Internet articles, often inaccurately copied verbatim from second and third hand sources. Dots thus …. indicate some text omitted from a sentence but obviously not with the intention of altering its meaning, but merely to summarise the central point being made. (Continues below)

2

The overall thrust of The First Global Revolution is that there are mounting global problems facing humanity which can only be solved through global action. The concept of sovereign nations and the notion of the individual are presented as a major part of these problems. Against this background, let’s pull some quotes from the book which deal with intense areas of concern for critics of the New World Order agenda.

Reduction in living standards in Western nations and the eradication of the middle class: “In seeking a normative approach to world development at this moment of turbulence and change, it is vital to discover whether the present levels of material prosperity in the rich, industrialized countries are compatible with global sustainability or, better perhaps, whether a world economy driven by stimulated consumer demand can continue for long.” (Page 44)

“The indispensible measures will be unpopular, costly and painful, and wealth will inescapably have to be shared. This means a whole lifestyle and pattern of consumption will have to be modified in the industrialized countries. …but minds are not in the least prepared for this multi-faceted revolution. Unless public opinion is truly educated and intensely prepared for the acceptance of new living conditions, we can expect revolt and inertia to occur…” (P159)

“Our efforts to create a sustainable world society and economy demand that we diminish the profligate lifestyles in the industrialised countries through a slow-down in consumption – which may, in any case, be forced upon us by environmental constraints.” (P227)

Uncontrolled mass immigration as a means to dilute national identity: “It is clear that no measures will effectively stop the immigration trends. This could induce a sharp rise in defensive racism in the receiving countries and encourage the emergence of a series of right wing dictators swept in by popular vote. Such situations must not be allowed to develop. It is therefore equally important… to prepare the populations of the rich countries to accept this reality.” (P56)

cctv

The emergence of the Big brother state: “There will be the means for electronic control of everyone’s activities, for ‘Big Brother’ dictators and societies, far more effective than myriads of secret police.” (P59)

Man-made global warming: “Can we live without enemies? Every state has been so used to classifying its neighbours as friend or foe that the sudden absence of traditional adversaries has left government and public opinion with a great void. New enemies have therefore to be identified, new strategies imagined, new weapons devised. The new enemies may have changed in nature and location, but they are no less real. They threaten the whole human race and their names are pollution, water shortage, famine, malnutrition, illiteracy, unemployment. However, it appears that awareness of the new enemies is, as yet, insufficient to elicit world cohesion and solidarity for the fight.” (P95-96)

“In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we suggested that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.” (P102)

The previous quote is often linked directly with these quotes, also from P102:

“All these dangers are caused by human intervention.” and also “The real enemy then is humanity itself.”

However, the complete paragraph from P102 reads thus: “In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we suggested that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. In their totality and in their interactions, these phenomena constitute a common threat which demands the solidarity of all peoples. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap about which we have already warned, namely mistaking symptoms for causes. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changed attitudes and behaviour that they can be overcome. The real enemy then is humanity itself.”

logo_un

World government: “Is this new world we find ourselves in governable? The answer is: probably not with the existing structures and attitudes… there is an increasingly evident contradiction between the urgency of making some decisions and the democratic procedure founded on various dialogues such as parliamentary debate, public debate and negotiations with trade unions or professional organizations. …Its disadvantage lies in the time it takes, especially at international level… the slowness of decision making in a democratic system is particularly damaging at the international level.” (P99)

“While for some countries the principle of sovereignty is the only basis for cohesion and national identity, it is increasingly incompatible with the realities of interdependence.” (P165)

Critics of the European Union and the sameness now prevalent among British political parties will recognise trends forecast in this statement:

“In most democratic countries operating on a multi-party system, a model of confrontation has evolved and spread throughout national life …there are strong reasons for attempting, in both political and industrial relations, to inculcate a change of attitude in the direction of consensus-building. In the face of the gravity of the decisions that will have to be taken in the near future, artificially stimulated party rivalries… could lead to disaster. There is an overwhelming need to establish the maximum of common agreement between political parties… if we are to weather the many storms ahead. To this end it would be useful to bring together representatives of different parties in a non-political forum.” (P174-175)

climate_change_carbon_tax

Restrictions on the use of energy: “Highest priority must be given to energy conservation and efficiency in the transmission and use of energy in every sector of the economy. …To achieve the necessary savings here will require fundamental changes in the habits of millions of individuals.” (P132)

“We hear many proposals for energy taxation suggested by present difficulties. These demand consideration. Interesting proposals have also been made for energy to be used as the basis for general taxation, both national and local. Many possibilities are opening up in this new field and The Club Of Rome has proposed study of the various suggestions for energy taxation designed to control the energy in the North and to ensure that in the South development should be on the basis of clean energy.” (P137)

N.B. Many take this last point as tacit admission that the Third World will never be permitted to industrialise.

Summary: Page 229 offers a summary and overview of the text.

“The whole of this book is a call for world solidarity. Living as we do at the onset of the first global revolution, on a small planet which we seem hellbent to destroy, beset by conflicts, in an ideological and political vacuum, faced with problems of global dimensions which the fading nation states are impotent to solve, with immense scientific and technological possibilities for the improvement of the human condition, rich in knowledge but poor in wisdom, we search for the keys to survival and sustainability.”

Many of the general ideas put forward in The First Global Revolution are wide open to interpretation. Others are more specific. In either case, the key lies in how – if and when adopted – these proposals are taken forward, developed and implemented. There exists both the possibility for an enlightened global society living in peace and harmony, and of an enforced global dictatorship where individual freedoms have been all but eradicated. At this present moment the world seems to be headed for the latter. The First Global Revolution and the reams of documents like it may contain mere ideas. But ideas have consequences.

Comment on this Article

Quangos blackball… oops, sorry… veto ‘racist’ everyday phrases

Tuesday, August 25th, 2009

It could be construed as a black day for the English language — but not if you work in the public sector. Dozens of quangos and taxpayer-funded organisations have ordered a purge of common words and phrases so as not to cause offence. Among the everyday sayings that have been quietly dropped in a bid to stamp out racism and sexism are “whiter than white”, “gentleman’s agreement”, “black mark” and “right-hand man”. (Continues below)

 sheriff-politicalcorrection


The Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission has advised staff to replace the phrase “black day” with “miserable day”, according to documents released under freedom of information rules. It points out that certain words carry with them a “hierarchical valuation of skin colour”. The commission even urges employees to be mindful of the term “ethnic minority” because it can imply “something smaller and less important”.

Read article: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article6806502.ece

Comment on this Article

NO2ID - Stop ID cards and the database state