Legalise Freedom

 

Police State

Leaderless Resistance: Divorcing the System

Wednesday, March 31st, 2010

We have had plenty of time and pleasure exposing the Illuminati/Banker/B’nai B’rith/Freemason conspiracy. But wallowing in spooky stories of MKUltra, Fractional Reserve Banking, Satanism and what have you does indeed invite depression. Ed Griffin rightly said something to the effect of ’scaring people to death with all these stories creates apathy; talking solutions creates action’.

And Don Bradley is absolutely correct that we need individual action. Maybe small organizations by determined individuals. But we need to understand very clearly that our self-declared masters hope to get us into a fight. Fighting is what they are good at. They relish the blood sacrifices for their fallen angel. They enjoy the fear and pain that it brings. They have been preparing for this fight for decades, if not centuries. They are ready for it and they will an open battle without a doubt. 

Edward Gibbon stated: ‘the tyrant of a single town, or a small district, would soon discover that an hundred armed followers were a weak defence against ten thousand peasants or citizens; but an hundred thousand well-disciplined soldiers will command, with despotic sway, ten millions of subjects.’

But the solution to our predicament is quite simple. One only needs to understand that their incredible power is based on our cooperation. It is dependent on it. We despise the system, but let’s face it: we are working within it. Most of us are trying to get their share of the crumbs our masters leave on the table.

DISCONNECTING FROM THE SYSTEM

The Illuminati fear only one thing: non-cooperation. We are in total control of our fate and we can quickly make this NWO nightmare go away by taking just a few simple steps. I’ll propose four, which I believe are key and are easy to achieve, but there are more and will leave it to the intelligence of all out there to be creative on this one.

Read article: http://www.henrymakow.com/by_anthony_migchelsfor_henryma.html

Comment on this Article

David Icke returns to Alex Jones TV: The State of Our Planet

Sunday, February 21st, 2010

Comment on this Article

Exposed: naked body scanner images of film star printed, circulated by airport staff

Wednesday, February 10th, 2010

Claims on behalf of authorities that naked body scanner images are immediately destroyed after passengers pass through new x-ray backscatter devices have been proven fraudulent after it was revealed that naked images of Indian film star Shahrukh Khan were printed out and circulated by airport staff at Heathrow in London.

UK Transport Secretary Lord Adonis said last week that the images produced by the scanners were deleted “immediately” and airport staff carrying out the procedure are fully trained and supervised.

“It is very important to stress that the images which are captured by body scanners are immediately deleted after the passenger has gone through the body scanner,” Adonis told the London Evening Standard. (Continues below)

 


Adonis was forced to address privacy concerns following reports that the images produced by the scanners broke child pornography laws in the UK. When the scanners were first introduced, it was also speculated that images of famous people would be ripe for abuse as the pictures produced by the devices make genitals “eerily visible” according to journalists who have investigated trials of the technology.

However, the Transport Secretary’s assurances were demolished after it was revealed on the BBC’s Jonathan Ross show Friday that Indian actor Shahrukh Khan had passed through a body scan and later had the image of his naked body printed out and circulated by Heathrow security staff.

“I was in London recently going through the airport and these new machines have come up, the body scans. You’ve got to see them. It makes you embarrassed – if you’re not well endowed,” said Khan, referring to how the scans produce clear images of a person’s genitals.

Read article: http://www.infowars.com/exposed-naked-body-scanner-images-of-film-star-printed-circulated-by-airport-staff/

Comment on this Article

Airline passengers have ‘no right’ to refuse naked body scanners

Thursday, January 28th, 2010

Airline passengers will have no right to refuse to go through a full-body search scanner when the devices are introduced at Heathrow airport next week, ministers have confirmed.

The option of having a full-body pat-down search instead, offered to passengers at US airports, will not be available despite warnings from the government’s Equality and Human Rights Commission that the scanners, which reveal naked bodies, breach privacy rules under the Human Rights Act.

The transport minister Paul Clark told MPs a random selection of passengers would go through the new scanners at UK airports. The machines’ introduction would be followed later this year by extra “trace” scanners, which can detect liquid explosives. A draft code of practice covering privacy and health issues is being discussed in Whitehall.

Clark dealt with concerns raised by the Commons home affairs select committee about the ability of airports abroad to upgrade their security to similar levels by indicating that extra support and help was under discussion.

Lord West, the counter-terrorism minister, told the MPs the government had firmly ruled out the introduction of “religious or ethnic profiling” into transport security. Instead, he said, airport security staff were being trained in “behavioural profiling”, which meant spotting passengers who had paid cash, were travelling with only a book for luggage on a long-haul flight or were behaving erratically at the airport.

He said the decision to raise the terror threat level to “severe” – meaning an attack was highly likely but not imminent – had been taken by security service officials at the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre last Friday.

The decision, thought to be based on an increase in intelligence traffic on threats from Yemen, was confirmed by the home secretary, Alan Johnson.

West refused to discuss the intelligence behind the decision, saying he was not going to jeopardise “getting the bastards”.

The body scanner trials, which are due to start at Heathrow next week, will involve a machine that has spotted the type of concealed device used in the Detroit airline bombing attempt.

Read article: http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2010/jan/26/new-body-scanners-heathrow

Comment on this Article

‘Shadow Government’ DVD trailers

Wednesday, January 13th, 2010

Comment on this Article

Airport body scanners: a line in the sand?

Sunday, January 3rd, 2010

Upon the recent announcement by the British government that full body scanners are to be introduced at UK airports, I find myself facing something of a conundrum. When trials of these scanners recently commenced at selected American airports and their across-the-board introduction was mooted, I was adamant that such humiliation and intrusion into privacy was a bridge too far. I decided that I simply had to draw a line in the sand and refuse to submit any further to the gathering Big Brother state. In the wake of yet another botched, half-baked and highly suspicious ‘terrorist attack’, I’m now facing this day of reckoning sooner than I might have expected.

The question, then, is do I simply go along to get along as I have thus far with each new outrageous intrusion inflicted upon us in the name of fighting the so-called ‘war on terrorism’? After all, I made myself a promise: I will not be marched like a criminal or prisoner through one of those machines. I don’t do much flying these days, but when I do fly, I appreciate the time it saves over alternative methods of travel. However, in an attempt to figure out how I can keep my promise to myself, today I began to revisit some ways of getting around that I used to employ. The train, for example, and cross channel ferries. No one knows what future security measures may be implemented in railway stations and shipping terminals, but for now, they’re being spared the close scrutiny and draconian police state regimes which are rapidly turning catching a plane into one of life’s most unpleasant experiences.

The bigger question, however, is when we are going to stop giving in to all this. What will it take for us, collectively, to say enough is enough? I would imagine that all of you would draw the line at compulsory cavity searches on all flights? You’d like to think so, wouldn’t you? Based on the evidence so far, though, that’s not quite a foregone conclusion. When the next ‘terrorist’ bogeyman sets fire to his genitals or shoes or hat or whatever it may be, will we yet again go along to get along with the ramping up of harassment and humiliation in the name of ‘safety’? (Continues below)

scan

As a cautionary thought, consider how far we’ve already come. For those of you who still see reasonable limits on Big Brother’s control over our lives and on the burgeoning police state, you need only look at history. I grew up in the 1980s, a decade – like all others – which witnessed its fair share of tyranny. And yet if you’d suggested to me back then that we would one day line up like cattle to be searched and questioned, to be ordered around and treated like dirt, to be prevented from carrying even a bottle of water, and all in the name of ‘safety’ and just to catch a bloody airplane? I’d have said ‘No way! People will never, ever go along with that.’ And yet here we are.

Personally, I believe that the ‘threat’ posed by terrorism is relatively remote at best and at worst, often manipulated into being to further an agenda of societal control. But whatever you believe, massive, invasive and dehumanizing ill-treatment of human beings by other human beings has no place in our common future. Whether you believe that Al-Qaeda is entirely as presented to us by the mainstream media or instead a deadly fiction concocted by shadowy secret service groups is in some respects neither here nor there. Unless we address the cause of this disease of violence and cease merely reacting to its symptoms, the path down which we are currently headed will grow much, much darker.

The good news is that we hold incredible power in our own hands if we will only choose to use it. This means saying ‘enough is enough’. It means drawing a line in the sand. It means saying ‘no’. Up to this point, we’ve not been good at doing that. Most of us have said nothing at all. Most of us have gone along to get along. We need to ask ourselves when that’s going to stop.

Comment on this Article

March to ID cards costing the public quarter of a million pounds a day

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

The roll out of the controversial identity cards has already cost the public millions of pounds and the bill is growing, figures show. The daily cost to the taxpayer for the expansion of the biometric documents is now six times the size it was just three years ago. Last month it emerged some 28 million people would have to sign up for an ID card in order to cover the cost of the scheme.

The Identity and Passport Service spent £42 million on developing both the ID cards and biometric passport programmes in the six months since March this year. That was equivalent of £229,508 every day – the highest amount of spending on the joint scheme so far. In 2008/09, a total of £81.5 million was spent – the equivalent of £223,288 a day. Between April 2003 and April 2006, a grand total of £41.1 million was spent – just £37,534 a day, although costs were always expected to rise as the programme expanded and began to roll out.

Both the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives have pledged to scrap ID cards if they win power next year. Overall, the scheme is expected to cost £4.5 billion over ten year, money which the Lib Dems said they would spend on extra police instead.

Read article: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/politics/lawandorder/6563868/March-to-ID-cards-costing-the-public-quarter-of-a-million-pounds-a-day.html

Comment on this Article

NO2ID - Stop ID cards and the database state